www.flickr.com/umoutlaws

about us

Michigan Outlaws is the University of Michigan Law School's LGBTQi(&allies) student association. As of today, we have over fifty active members and hundreds of alumni throughout the world. Our goals are simply to create a welcoming environment for LGBTQi students and to provide a forum for exploration and education in queer legal issues.

executive board

  • Co-chair: Mary (2L)
  • Co-chair: Claire (1L)
  • Treasurer: Mike (1L)
  • Secretary: Bob (2L)

  • 1L Rep: Claire (1L)
  • Alum, Admiss, & Fac: Samara (1L)
  • Bsmnt Grp Relations: Rooks (1L)
  • PAC: Steve (1L)
  • Social Chair: Sarah (1L)
  • Campus Liaison: Tom (1L)


about umls

outlaws info

faQs

student resources




previous posts

archives

other outlaws

Thursday, April 27, 2006

[event] Lavender Graduation

Last year I had the privilege of attending Lavender graduation for the first time. This afternoon at 4, I not only get to attend, but I've been asked to present an award in recognition of the service of one of my friends. It is such an honor for me to pay tribute to his hard work, commitment and dedication to other people's needs. Last year there was not a single law school graduate in attendance, and I expect to see no difference this year. But, it is nevertheless very cool to see all the other young queer students graduating. I had the option of "graduating" with this class but chose not to as I won't be officially graduating until December and it felt a little like putting the cart before the horse. Of course, that means that I probably will never actually attend Lavender Graduation for my own graduation, but I can live with that. I'm just delighted that I get to participate in this one in a meaningful way. Go PJ!

Cross-posted at Life, Law, Gender


Wednesday, April 26, 2006

[plug] Women in Motion Dance Party

Women in Motion Dance Party - a monthly women's dance party

Our upcoming dance parties are this Saturday (April 29) and Saturday, May 13. 10pm - 1am, $5 admission. These are casual and fun dance parties--you can dance all night or sit in the lounge area and make some new friends.

danceRevolution Dance Studio (here)
603 E. William ~ 1 blk W. of State, above NYPD ~ Ann Arbor


[news] Day of Silence / Day of Truth



Today is Day of Silence, when high school and college students around the country symbolize societal repression of gayness by repressing their voices for a day. Instead of speaking, they (in theory) hand their listener a card explaining the situation, and the listener (in theory) nods in understanding. Personally, not a Day of Silence went by in undergrad where I didn't forget 400 times and catch myself gabbing my trap off. At least I had a pocketful of explanatory cards as to why I suddenly stopped talking mid-sentence.

If there weren't a counter demonstration to Day of Silence, I would be disappointed. Luckily, there is: Day of Truth is designed to help kids who believe gayness is morally wrong speak out. They have a very nice legal guide which encourages students to be respectful, yet forceful in their rights: "Remind school officials that they permit other students to hold a 'Day of Silence;' Remind school officials that they permit other students to wear T-shirts with imprinted messages and symbols; Remind school officials that they permit other students to distribute personal messages, notes, and other communications in non-class settings."

In contrast, the Day of Silence manual is heavy on media relations and very light on legal support. Maybe someone could look into that?

Looking back on my own high school years, it would have made an incredibly positive difference in my life if someone had just talked about being gay. I wish I had lived in a world of GSAs and days of silence. But, at the same time, I'm not so keen on bullying kids who have legitimate moral difficulties with gayness into silence. The kid who wants to scream "faggot" and beat kids up--you can do whatever you want with him. But the honest Christian girl who really believes that the school shouldn't be supporting something dangerous, she should have some healthy outlet for that, some way to express it without being given the chance to develop a persecution complex.

Maybe there's a difference, though. As a Canadian friend of mine once pointed out, there are actions which expand rights and actions which limit them--we should protect the former at the cost of the latter. A Day of Silence speaker is asking for acceptance of himself, while a Day of Truth speaker is asking for condemnation of someone else. It's a moral difference, and maybe one we should think about. But I'm not so sure it's a difference you could hang a school policy on. Seems like blatant view-point discrimination to me.

In any event, I see no reason to be afraid of anti-gay speech that is made respectfully and honestly. If nothing, it gets the other side's position out on the table for everyone to see how silly it is. For example: Ten Big Myths About Homosexuality. See? Silly.

Best of luck to everyone on their respective days of protest.


Sunday, April 23, 2006

[opinion] No More Penguins, Please.

Here's another punch in the fight over teaching about same-sex parents in schools. This book, however, is no sneaky gay penguin book (And Tango Make Three): it's pointedly about a prince who, in his own words has, "never cared much for princesses."

Personally, I'm giddy. I grew up in a world without a single reference to gayness (outside of locker room taunts), without a single role model to tell me that (1) not every kid felt the way I did, and therefore I was, in fact, different; and (2) that it's ok--it's possible to be gay and be happy and be healthy. So, when my nieces and nephews came of age, I gay penguined them with Bend It Like Beckham, a movie that discusses religious and cultural acceptance, sexual orientation (indirectly), and soccer. My family's next generation would not go through life ignorant that gay people exist. They would not be taken by surprise.

And that's the strategy of this Massachusetts school. According to the principal, "Lexington is committed to teaching children about the world they live in, and in Massachusetts same-sex marriage is legal." The parents spin it the other way. "They're trying to indoctrinate our children," Robin Wirthlin responded. Yes, education is indoctrination when you don't like what is being taught.

That's the inherent problem with government speech (which public education undoubtedly is). Every statement of X by the State probably makes not-X sound less appealing. The First Amendment forbids government from abridging private speech, but says nothing about government's own speech being neutral or palatable to dissenters. Your remedy for such speech is the political process.

Now for my soap box. Queer kids, myself included, sat through public school for years and years. We read Romeo and Juliet, we read Jane Eyre. We heard about notable presidents and their wives. We stood boy-girl-boy-girl in line, whatever that was supposed to accomplish. And the whole time, even if we didn't have words for it, we were thinking or feeling in our stomachs, "What about me?"

A lot of those queer kids grew up thinking that they were broken, that their sexuality was diseased or dysfunctional in some way. Some of us realized that we were fine--society was simply not set up for the possibility of us. We were like left-handers in a sea of uncomfortable desks.

If parents such as Mrs. Wirthlin want to continue that status quo, where gay people don't exist and her children's classmates sit in emotional torment because society won't recognize their family or their affections--all because of her own moral indignation--then she is free to do so. But, the political tides are turning, and society is beginning to realize that the harm to a queer kid from being relegated to invisibility far outweighs the harm to a straight kid whose sexuality is a relative non-issue in his life.

When we read books like King and King, we're not just talking to Mrs. Wirthlin's kid. We're talking to the queer kid, or the kid with lesbian moms. We want that kid to know he's ok. Not through winks and nods and gay penguins--we want to say it outright. You're ok. Be happy.


Wednesday, April 19, 2006

[note] Regents Meeting to Discuss Gender Identity Amendment to Bylaws

From our friends at LGBTA...

FRIDAY - REGENTS MEETING - DETAILS BELOW

On behalf of the Wolverine Commission for Human Rights see also the attached 1/6th sheet for passing out...

Show Your Support to make a change!

Our Goal:

Standing Room Only!!!!! At the Regents Meeting Come and support our speakers!! (you can study while waiting for the speakers to be called upon)

Friday, April 21, 9:00-11:00am
Fleming Admin Bldg
Cube Side, 1st Room on Right

Equal Rights For All at UM "gender identity or expression"

Why is better implementation of the TBLG Task Force recommendations important?

Students, staff, and faculty confront serious risk of harassment, rejection, exclusion, abuse, disrespect, violence, and conflict with peers and professors.

They are also at risk for compromised grading, and promotion and tenure vulnerabilities, regardless of the eligibility of the individual.

Sponsored by: WCHR
(Wolverine Coalition for Human Rights)


Tuesday, April 18, 2006

[news] UM Senate Assembly Supports Gender Identity Addition to Discrimination Bylaws

As we originally reported here, the UM Senate Assembly (the governing body of the university faculty) had under consideration an amendment to the bylaws which would add "gender expression and identity" to the list of categories protected against discrimination. We're happy to report that the amendment passed: 27-3.

[edit]
The original post was slightly confusing. This is just a resolution by the Senate Assembly (which represents the faculty). The Board of Regents must still vote on the amendment to the bylaws. The amendment has been before the Regents since Summer of '04. We hope that this show of support by the faculty will help the Regents see how important this provision is to our community.

Senate Resolution Concerning Gender Identity and Gender Expression

Whereas transgender persons are vulnerable to discrimination, harassment, and violence;

Whereas student groups have rallied to influence the University Administration and the Board of Regents to include "gender expression and gender identity" in the list of categories protected against discrimination;

Whereas the University Administration has responded to these pressures by including "gender identity and gender expression" as a footnote to the category of "sex" in SPG 201.35;

Whereas gender identity and gender expression are not conceptual sub-categories of sex as presently stated in the University’s non-discrimination policies;

Whereas 52 colleges and universities across the United States have to date changed their nondiscrimination policies to include gender identity and gender expression as protected categories;

Whereas the University of Michigan faculty have not yet spoken in support of these changes through its governing structure of the Senate Assembly;

Therefore the Senate Assembly resolves that the University of Michigan Regents Bylaw 14.06 should be changed to include "gender identity" and "gender expression" as categories in the nondiscrimination policy statement.

Be it also resolved that Standard Practice Guide policy on non-discrimination (201.35) should be changed to include "gender identity" and "gender expression" with all other categories in this SPG, and NOT as a footnote to "sex" as presently written.

Be it also resolved that the Standard Practice Guide preventing discrimination based on sexual orientation (601.6) should be broadened to include "gender identity" and "gender expression" as categories protected by this policy.

Attachments:

Regents Bylaws 14.06

SPG 201.35

SPG 601.6


(lovingly stolen from this post on life, law, and gender blog)


Monday, April 17, 2006

[news] Funeral Protests and the First Amendment



When it comes to regulating speech, one thing is almost always certain: the legislature, with all the best intentions in the world, will go too far. Speech affects people deeply. To hear something awful, vile, or offensive cuts much deeper than any unfair contract provision or personal injury tort. You, as a judge or legislator, have sympathy for the injured plaintiff in an accident, but offensive speech, regardless of who it's aimed at, hurts you directly. "Something must be done!" and that something is usually a knee-jerk over-reaction--shut it all down.

The First Amendment Center has compiled a list of state laws aimed at funeral protests. Here is a portion of the South Dakota bill:

Section 1. No person may engage in any act of picketing that is likely to cause emotional distress to any family member who is privately and peacefully mourning the loss of a deceased relative during the period from one hour before the scheduled commencement of the funeral services until one hour after the actual completion of the funeral services.


It looks ok--we don't want people causing funeral-goers emotional distress, so we limit the time they can picket around funerals. But, what kind of speech would cause emotional distress at a funeral? Hidden in the bill is a content bias--well-wishers could picket, Phelps couldn't. The state is not allowed to pick and choose.

Robert M. O'Neil, founder and director of the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression, said: "Despite the apparent content neutrality, these measures target a particular subject matter in ways that - and for reasons that - imply a concern with content.

"I would not view such measures as time, place and manner limited - and would assume (for example) that symbolic displays respectful or laudatory of the deceased would not be banned," he said.

O'Neil also pointed out that "only one occasion or event is targeted for quite unusual restrictions."


Wisconsin's bill (pdf) limits only noise, blockades, and signs and chants that contain "fighting words;" and does so only an hour before and after the funeral. But, it also forbids "loud protests" that involve "singing" or "honking" (or other things) with the purpose of disrupting the funeral. Once again--who would have such a purpose? People who disagree with something about the deceased. People there to support and cheer on the deceased would be free under law to do so. The devil (in this case the content restriction) is in the details.

The whole thing is tricky, and our sense of decency demands that people like Phelps not be allowed to be so mean. But, I believe there's little the government can do to stop him. Have the funeral in the back of the graveyard. Caravan in and close the gates behind you. Don't publish the date and time in the paper. I wish you well.


Sunday, April 16, 2006

[note] On Easter...



A gay blog with an egg on it. Will we monsters stop at nothing to steal happiness from little children?

"A maximum of five tickets will be issued per person. Children of all ages are welcome to attend, as long as there is at least one child seven years old or under and no more than two adults per group." The Official Website of Easter (at the White House) (whitehouse.gov)

"Dozens of gay couples and their children are planning to make their presence felt at the annual White House Easter egg party -- no matter what the conservative occupants think. ... Despite the opposition of conservative religious groups however, Bush and his wife Laura have made it known they will not stop the gay parents attending." Gay parents to crash White House Easter party (politicalgateway.com)

"The White House isn't taking the political bait; the First Lady Laura Bush issued a statement welcoming all families to the event. So -- much to the disappointment of the left -- this year's Easter Egg Roll will not be a platform for bashing Republicans as intolerant, homophobic, hayseed-hick bigots. But one thing ought to be made clear: there really is nothing scared to liberals. Not funerals... and certainly not religious holidays." Nothing Sacred (rushlimbaugh.com)

"It's just the idea of turning every little thing into a political passion play, when it's really just an Easter egg media event, the way it has been for decades. We like seeing that on television on Sunday. The kids, too. Protest tomorrow and the next day and the next instead, OK?" Politics should take a holiday on Easter (journalstandard.com)

"The practice was abandoned during Franklin D. Roosevelt's presidency, and revived by Mamie Eisenhower during her husband's term in office. Mrs. Eisenhower opened the event to African American children for the first time." Egg-rolling (wikipedia.org)

"They are gay, and like about a hundred other parents who gathered near the White House in a tent city that mushroomed on the Ellipse Friday night, they ignored the gay-parenting instincts that in years past told them not to bother coming to mainstream events like this one. ... 'We're hoping other people will see we're just normal parents, like everyone else,' said Finamore, 39. 'And we're boring, actually,' added Velasco, 35." Newcomers Join Egg Roll Line (washingtonpost.com)

"At the end of the day as egg rollers say goodbye, each receives a special presidential wooden egg complete with the signatures of the President and the First Lady and departs with fond memories of this happy tradition at the White House." History of the White House Egg Roll (nara.gov)


Saturday, April 15, 2006

[note] Thanks!

We'd like to take a moment to thank those people who have supported us through purchases from our store this month.


Robert H., from Texas, picked up two of our "I love...period" shirts.



Kristin S., from Ohio, wanted to remind the world that Scalia keeps it old school.



Michael S., from New York, concurred with us that O'Connor is nothing if not agreeable.



Thanks guys!


Friday, April 14, 2006

[doc] Don't Ask Don't Tell Toolkit for Law Students

from our dear friend, kara...

Dear Solomon Amici,

I'm forwarding along a resource in response to several inquiries from law students about what they can do now (in addition to protest) following the Supreme Court's decision upholding the Solomon Amendment.

Attached is a toolkit designed specifically for law students (and faculty) interested in joining the effort to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," which I developed for a recent workshop on this issue at the University of Michigan Law School. Please distribute it freely and widely. It will be refined a bit more in the coming months in anticipation of a proposed workshop on this topic at Lavender Law in September, and I'll forward along an updated version when it's completed.

In preparing for the workshop at Michigan Law, I became more convinced than ever that law students can significantly accelerate the repeal effort. If there's anything I can do to facilitate, please don't hesitate to contact me.

My best,

Kara

**********
Kara Suffredini
Legislative Lawyer

National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
1325 Massachusetts Ave. NW, 6th Floor
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: 202.639.6311
Fax: 202.393.2241


(link to toolkit) (pdf)


Thursday, April 13, 2006

[event] 3L Appreciation Day!



These guys have done amazing things here at Michigan, and now they're heading out into the world to do even more. I've very proud to have spent time with them.

(link to more pictures)

note: these aren't all of the 3Ls... these are the ones who happened to be there when the cameras came out. i didn't do a formal count or anything, but i think we had about 15-20 outlaws graduating this year.


Wednesday, April 12, 2006

[event] 3L Farewell

Let us say goodbye to you in style (or at least in the style to which you're accustomed).















Thursday, April 13, 2006 -- 5p

Dominick's -- EVERYONE come and help us say farewell to our graduating 3L's.

Plenty of food will be available. Come enjoy it!


Tuesday, April 11, 2006

[news] UM Senate Assembly to Vote on Gender Identity Bylaw

from our friend, Professor Frier...

Next Monday, April 17, the Senate Assembly (the governing body of the University Faculty) will consider the attached resolution which favors changing Regents Bylaw 14.06 to include "gender identity and gender expression." The resolution also favors corresponding changes in the Standard Practice Guides.

I did not originally draft this resolution myself, but I was (as an incoming member of SACUA) given some freedom to influence its wording; in particular, on my urging the resolution was expanded to include Bylaw change. In that respect, the most important likely consequence of the resolution is to prevent false implications being drawn from Faculty failure to act on this issue. I had originally brought this matter to the attention of SACUA, and Jackie Simpson and others had major influence on SACUA's subsequent deliberations.

You are all certainly free to attend the Senate Assembly meeting if you wish, and, if you are a member of the Faculty, also to address the meeting, although only the elected members of Senate Assembly may vote on the resolution. I expect the resolution to be carried easily, but there was one negative vote in SACUA. (The negative vote will probably not be reported publicly.)

The Senate Assembly will meet in the Rackham Amphitheater from 3:15 to 5:00. Discussion of the resolution is currently scheduled for 3:30. B.


[news] Pentagon Admits to Spying on Gay School Groups

After receiving a tip that "several homosexual and pro-gay groups are planning to 'protest hate & recruiters on NYU campus (NYC),'" the name of one such group, OUTLaws, was used to justify spying on the demonstrations. "The term 'OUTlaws' is a backhanded way of saying it's all right to commit possible violence and serve as 'vigilantes' during the symposium," one memo speculates. The document later acknowledges that the name "may refer to members of the gay community that are now 'out' in the open and studying at law school." Noting that there was little information about the group available through an Internet search, the report concludes that there was still a "potential for confrontation."


Good thing for us we have a website!

(link to article)


[edit]

wait...isn't this old news?


Monday, April 10, 2006

[news] News Roundup

Scalia Promotes his Originalist Agenda--in Switzerland

Not content to be crotchedy only here in America, Scalia took to the road spreading the truth of American Constitutionalism to the people who needed it most. The Swiss.

"Question comes up, Is there a constitutional right to homosexual conduct?" Scalia said at the lecture. "Not a hard question to me. It's absolutely clear that nobody ever thought when the Bill of Rights was adopted that it gave a right to homosexual conduct."

"Homosexual conduct was criminal for 200 years in every state," he said. "Easy question."

Yes, it's an easy question if you refuse to think about it.


Gay Commercial Censored by Gay Television Station

Proof yet again that the revolution will not in fact be televised, LOGO has declined to air a pro-gay church ad on its uber-gay station, because, they claim, the ad is disparaging to other churches. The ad involves certain traditional minorities, including--I suppose--homosexuals, being given ejector-seat farewells at a church. I guess they then land in the UCC church where everyone welcomes them (unless they land in one of the 97 UCC churches that broke off over the gay marriage vote).

It's noble not to want to disparage someone's religion. But, you can't discuss this issue (homosexuality and the church) without implicitly claiming a side. It's lame that the gay television station is scared to be controversial. Do they only love gay people to the extent it will bolster their bottom line? Or are they a gay station, with all the counter-culture, risk-taking implications that go along with that designation?


Friday, April 07, 2006

[news] Domestic Partner Benefits Under Prop 2

Jay Kaplan, staff attorney for the ACLU of Michigan's LGBT project, writes:

On Tuesday, April 11th 2006 at 10 am, a panel of three Michigan Court of Appeals judges will hear arguments on whether Proposal 2- now a Michigan Constitutional Amendment, prohibits public employers from offering domestic partner benefits.

The ACLU of Michigan filed a declaratory judgment action in March 2005, asking the Court declare that domestic partner benefits are permissible under the amendment. In September 2005 Ingham County Circuit Court Judge Draganchuk issued an order that Proposal 2 did NOT prohibit the provision of these benefits. Attorney General Mike Cox appealed this decision to the Michigan Court of Appeals, arguing that the language of the amendment essentially prohibits any form of recognition of same-sex couples in any context. The ACLU will be arguing that by providing domestic partner benefits, public employers are not marrying anyone -- that domestic partner benefits are employee benefits, not legal benefits of marriage.

We urge you to attend the hearing and to bring family, friends and allies to demonstrate the strength of and support for LGBT families. The Michigan Court of Appeals courtroom is on the second floor of the Michigan Hall of Justice, located at 925 W. Ottawa in downtown Lansing.


(ganked from www.wayneoutlaws.org)


[plug] Campus-Wide QPoC Events

from our friends at the Office of Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Affairs...

Revitalize the Queer People of Color Student Group!

LGBTQ People of Color have particular concerns, interests and needs! Help provide a space for this dialogue and fellowship be renewing and revitalizing the Queer People of Color Undergrad group on campus.

How? Express interest by responding to this email. Then what? Participate in Leadership Connection, a five day leadership retreat designed to help student orgs organize themselves and network with other student orgs.

So act fast and be a part of action and change for the LGBTQ PoC revolution!




LGBT WOMEN/MEN OF COLOR AND THEIR ALLIES!!!...Meeting this Friday April
7 from 6 PM to 8 PM in 2237 Lane Hall.


We will start meeting tomorrow, with the purpose to create a safe space for ourselves. A place where we can have structured, honest, provacative, passionate dialogue about the 'ish'ues we face everyday as queer, lesbian, bisexual, trans women of color. It's a place not offered up at every corner of our society's block. The things people are afraid to talk about-racism, sexism, classism..we'll get down to it--with a slew of scheduled events, amazing guest facilitators, and (most importantly) a place where we can make human connections.

We ain't playin around with this one so dont miss it.

See ya then.


Thursday, April 06, 2006

[event] HOT Law Student Bar Night

that's right, HOT LAW STUDENT BAR NIGHT!!


All the Wayne State Outlaws will be there.
(the pres says there will be hot lesbians AND hot gay men)















Hot, hot, so hot. Tssssss...

We'll meet Friday (tomorrow) 9p at the reading room steps to walk over to Aut Bar.

315 Braun Ct.


Wednesday, April 05, 2006

[event] post rumsfeld v. fair: where do we go from here?




post rumsfeld v. fair: where do we go from here?


Kara Suffredini
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
April 10th, 12:20pm. 150HH.


On March 6, 2006, the Supreme Court handed down a decision in Rumsfeld v. FAIR stating that the Solomon Amendment did not violate the first Amendment rights of law schools with anti-discrimination policies. This decision is NOT the death knell in the battle of equality for the LGBT military community. Come learn why on Monday, April 10th when KaraSuffredini speaks about the FAIR decision and what we can do to contribute to the ongoing campaign against the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy.


Tuesday, April 04, 2006

[plug] LGBTA Campus-wide Events

Love Makes a Family Opening Gala
Tues April 4
6:30p - 8:30p
Michigan Room
2nd Floor Michigan League

Love Makes a Family Exhibit
Wed April 5 - Fri April 7
ground floor lobby space,Michigan Union

For the first time, the nationally acclaimed "Love Makes a Family" photo exhibit will come to Michigan and be on display in the State Capitol Building.

Gay family advocates are leading the way for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) families to be recognized and celebrated during the month of April by bringing a historic traveling photography exhibit in support of family diversity to Michigan called: "A Celebration of Diversity across Michigan: Love Makes A Family: Portraits of Lesbian, Gay Bisexual & Transgender People and Their Families." Michigan also observes April as "The Month of the Young Child."

Triangle Foundation, and organizer Shannon Cuttle, are bringing this landmark exhibit, that highlights GLBT families, to Michigan. Opening April 4th with a gala fundraising reception at the University of Michigan, the exhibit will then travel to
seven major universities around Michigan, and will stop at the Detroit Public Library's Main Branch.




The Office of LGBT Affairs and Counseling and Psychological Services (CAPS) will be showing the documentary "Hooked" on April 5th from 11:30 to 12:30, with the opportunity for discussion afterwards (until 1pm). The film be be shown in the LGBT office/CAPS meeting room. (Enter through LGBT Office.) Please feel free to bring your lunch.

Hooked is a documentary film exploring the online cruising phenomenon through the stories and reflections of gay men from around the country. Within the gay culture, online cruising - going online to meet other men and arranging an immediate, real-time sexual encounter - is rapidly emerging as a prime pastime. The implications of this Huxlian game range from simple, no-strings, libido-fulfilling sex to deeper, darker issues concerning how we relate to other men, as well as to society in
general. Ultimately, the film's progression forces us to ponder how the online cruising realm in fact leads to our feeling more alone, more isolated, than ever.




The Tranny Roadshow
Wed 5 April
7:00pm, Michigan Room
2nd Floor Michigan League

The Tranny Roadshow is a troupe of trans-identified performers who do education and advocacy about trans-issues through mixed media performance. More information can be found at http://www.trannyroadshow.org/about.html.


Sunday, April 02, 2006

[event] Journals, General Meeting,and LGBT & Judaism

Please note the following events occurring this week (4/3):

- Wednesday Lunch: 1L Journal Expo, rm. 118
- Wednesday 6:30 p.m. - 7:30 p.m.: Final meeting and elections, rm. 218
- Thursday Lunch: LGBT & Judaism, rm. 116